AB198. SOH21AS194. Post-operative care instructions: are we doing enough?
Orthopaedic Poster Session

AB198. SOH21AS194. Post-operative care instructions: are we doing enough?

Lyndon Yerng Hsien Low, Hussam Elkhwad, Ciara Egan

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland


Background: Good documentation of orthopaedic post-operative care instructions are crucial for the seamless transfer of patient care from the operating room to outpatient clinic. It is also important for medicolegal purposes. However, it is found that these instructions are not well documented in this Irish Orthopaedic department. This causes significant confusion of patient care pathway from the operative room to out-patient clinic.

Methods: Departmental standards were set based on the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) in England Good Surgical Practice (GSP) guidelines and a survey completed by all orthopaedic consultants in this tertiary referral hospital, of which we then measured our practice against. A retrospective audit on the post-op instructions on operative notes was undertaken for all orthopaedic trauma surgeries over a 10-day period. A closed loop audit was performed following introduction of a printed post-op care instructions proforma and education.

Results: General improvement in documentation of post-op care instructions across all 9 standards. Most notable improvements include: type of antibiotics written in 75% (12% previously), analgesia mentioned in 95% (46% previously), duration of DVT prophylaxis in 71% (0% previously), post-op bloods mentioned in 100% where indicated (50% previously), documentation of IMC /bleep number in 86% (38% previously), and removal of sutures mentioned in 73% where indicated (31% previously).

Conclusions: The introduction of a proforma serves as a checklist to the surgeon writing the operative note, and is therefore less likely to miss out important post-operative care instructions as compared to freehand written notes. Our results show a vast improvement of the quality of notes overall.

Keywords: Instructions; operative note; orthopaedics; post-operative care; documentation


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


doi: 10.21037/map-21-ab198
Cite this abstract as: Low LYH, Elkhwad H, Egan C. SOH21AS194. Post-operative care instructions: are we doing enough? Mesentery Peritoneum 2021;5:AB198.

Download Citation